Hardware implants in Ledger devices sold by CryptoBilis
Buyers of tampered units lost their recovery phrases at setup and, with them, their funds. The device design is not affected; the risk is in how the devices reached buyers.
Every recorded Ledger security incident, newest first, with severity, fix status and sources.
Buyers of tampered units lost their recovery phrases at setup and, with them, their funds. The device design is not affected; the risk is in how the devices reached buyers.
Users of Ledger Ethereum app 1.19.0 to 1.22.2 signing through a compromised host could approve a batch of more than 255 operations while seeing only one. Ledger describes exploitation as difficult and fixed the flaw in Ethereum app 1.22.3.
Users swapping tokens through Ledger's Exchange app with Ethereum app 1.20.0 to 1.22.2 could, via a hostile swap provider, sign a token approval for the agreed amount to the swap's deposit address instead of a payment. Ledger states the permission moves no funds by itself and found no evidence of exploitation.
Users of Ledger device apps built on Secure SDK releases from August 2025 through v26.6.0 could, if a compromised host or web page controlled the connection, approve an operation shown correctly on screen and sign different parameters. Ledger states it has no evidence of exploitation against users.
Monero holders using a Ledger Monero app older than 2.1.4 on a compromised computer could have their secret view and spend keys extracted without any prompt on the device while the app was open. Ledger states the issue is fixed in Monero app 2.1.4 and that the prerequisites considerably limit practical exploitability.
Mac users who installed the fake app and entered their recovery phrase lost about $9.5 million in total, according to ZachXBT. Ledger states it never asks for the recovery phrase.
Names, contact details, postal addresses and order details of an undisclosed number of Ledger.com customers who bought through Global-e were exposed, raising the risk of targeted phishing. Ledger states its systems, devices and customers' crypto assets were not affected.
A Ledger Nano X, Flex or Stax on firmware older than 2.4.2, 1.2.2 or 1.6.2 respectively could be made permanently unusable through a crafted MCU firmware update. Ledger states the impact is limited to device operability and funds were never at risk.
Users of dApps that loaded the compromised library, with any wallet, could be drained by approving malicious transactions during a window of under two hours. Ledger devices and Ledger Live were not compromised, according to Ledger.
Windows users who installed the fake app from the Microsoft Store lost about $768,000–$770,000 in total, according to press reports citing ZachXBT.
Owners whose addresses were in the leaked database could receive a convincing counterfeit built to collect their recovery phrase. Anyone who followed the instructions would hand attackers control of their funds.
Names, postal addresses, phone numbers and email addresses of Ledger buyers became public, which identifies them as crypto holders. No device or seed compromise was reported, but the data was later used for phishing, including fake devices sent by mail.
A Nano X tampered with before first use could act as a keyboard on the owner's computer or hide transactions from the screen. Ledger states the Secure Element and user secrets were not affected and that firmware 1.2.4-2 fixes the issue.
Users of the Ledger Bitcoin app and SegWit-capable forks before version 1.4.0 could lose funds to inflated fees if their computer's wallet software was compromised and they signed the same transaction twice. Ledger states the issue is fixed in Bitcoin app 1.4.0.
Monero holders using Ledger Monero app versions before 1.5.1 with a malicious or compromised Monero client could have their spend key extracted without any sign on the device. Ledger states the issue is fixed in Monero app 1.5.1.
An attacker with physical access to a Nano S, combined with malware on the owner's computer, or one positioned within close radio range of a Ledger Blue during PIN entry, could undermine the device's protections in lab conditions. Ledger states the findings showed no practical vulnerability and that no seed or PIN was extracted from a stolen device.
An attacker who handled a Nano S on firmware 1.3.1 or earlier, before delivery or after setup, could install firmware that controlled or captured the recovery seed. Devices on firmware 1.4.1 are not affected, according to Ledger.
More entries do not mean a less secure brand: widely sold devices draw more published research and more targeted attacks, and some vendors disclose more than others.
WalletInsights. Hardware wallet security incident tracker. Last checked November 4, 2026. https://walletinsights.io/en/security-incidents/ledger/
Vendors, researchers and readers can send corrections or statements to security@walletinsights.io. We check them against the sources, update the entry and record the change in its log.